UFO Online by dandare

UFO Updates, documents, archives, anything ufo related

The X-Hunters (Aerospace Archaeology Team).

Posted by dandare on February 2, 2008

ufo online

Two men Tony Moore and Peter Merlin, had a long fascination with spacecraft and airplanes; this was to eventually develop, after they were both interested in the XB-70, known to have crashed near Barstow, California in 1966 (not known to each other properly).They both came together to research X-70 planes at the Edwards AFB History Office, and ultimately found the area and then the exact spot where the plane crashed…. they soon began to research other x-planes, and this began a whole run of finding experimental x-plane sites from 1940-1970, and finding debris from these planes.
Photobucket

XB-51

They would spend alot of time on research, before even attempting to go into the field to discover the crash sites. Soon however, they found themselves involved with the Air Force Flight Test Centre Museum at Edwards.

“We donated artifacts and documentation about the crash sites to Doug Nelson, the curator. In time we earned his respect for our thoroughness and professionalism. We began to think we should give ourselves a more professional sounding name and, thus, the Aerospace Archeology Field Research Team was born.

In 1994 a freelance writer named Lance Thompson heard about our exploits through mutual friends and thought it would make a good story. After meeting Lance, we invited him to join us on our search for the X-1A crash site. He wrote a wonderful article and offered it to Aircraft Illustrated, Air Classics, and AIR&SPACE/Smithsonian magazines” (extract from article).

Photobucket

F100D (above)
“The Research Airplane Program was a joint effort by the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA, the predecessor of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration) and the military services. It was conceived near the end of Word War II to perform flight research with a series of specialized aircraft in the then-unexplored realms of transonic and supersonic flight.

Two general categories of aircraft were obtained for the project. They included those needed to explore new areas of performance and those required to investigate the effects of different airplane configurations. The project resulted in notable increases in knowledge about the dynamics of piloted flight in winged aircraft at speeds up to 4,500 miles per hour and at altitudes exceeding 350,000 feet.

The outstanding contributions of the Research Airplane Program, and subsequent flight research projects, include providing important information on previously unexplored aircraft characteristics; validating transonic and supersonic wind-tunnel test data and analytical techniques; and providing confidence in the achievement of safe, controllable, transonic/supersonic flight.

The first aircraft in the series was specifically designed to explore the transonic region and breach the so-called “sound barrier.” It was originally designated XS-1 to denote that it would be the first experimental sonic airplane. Later, the designation was shortened to X-1. Many research vehicles have since provided important data to scientists and aircraft designers. They have come to be known collectively as: The X-Planes” (extract from site).

Why has it been added to a UFO site, i hear you cry? well i think it is interesting to see what the Air Force were up to in its earlier days, and that its being dug up again. 

Ok i admit it; i just found this a fascinating article (sorry will not do it again – lol). 

To see the site please go to http://www.thexhunters.com/ .

Advertisements

2 Responses to “The X-Hunters (Aerospace Archaeology Team).”

  1. Peter Merlin said

    Actually, the X-Hunters web site has a great deal of relevance to UFO research.

    A UFO is ,by definition, an unidentified object and the whole point of conducting UFO research is to identify the object in question. If it simply flies overhead, we can only make a visual observation, but if it crashes there is a chance of obtaining physical evidence.

    Conventional wisdom amongst UFO researchers is that any government would give recovery of a crashed extraterrestrial craft the highest level of security classification. That means it would be a top-secret special access program where only a limited number of people with a need-to-know would be briefed in. Recovery of debris and cleanup of the site would have top priority and the government would have absolute control of the crash site for as long as necessary.
    In other words it would be indistinguishable from a similar recovery effort involving the crash of a top-secret special access program of terrestrial origin such as an unacknowledged “black” project from Area 51.

    It seems that many UFO crash retrieval stories share some common elements:
    – The incident and recovery allegedly had the highest level of security classification.
    – The object crashed on public land in relatively close proximity to a civilian population.
    – Civilian witnesses were interrogated and warned by government officials to forget what they saw.
    – The crash site was secured and controlled by government personnel for as long as deemed necessary to conduct recovery operations.
    – Cleanup of crash debris was top priority.

    I have researched about a dozen incidents involving retrievals of various classified aerospace vehicles and weapons in the western U.S., spanning a period of approximately 50 years. Many of these incidents share the characteristics described above but involve aircraft tested at such places as Area 51 and Tonopah Test Range, Nevada, and Edwards Air Force Base, California. Several of them were unacknowledged “black” programs at the time of the crashes. Visiting these crash sites today and studying the remaining physical evidence provides insight into the effectiveness of government/military crash-retrieval activities. As case studies, these sites can provide comparative baseline data for use when studying reported UFO crash sites.

    As far as I can tell, even the most enthusiastic and motivated UFO researchers are likely to say it’s a waste of time to look for debris at an alleged UFO crash site because the government would have cleaned up every trace. I think I may be the first to say that this is not the case. My research clearly offers hope of finding physical evidence – the “Holy Grail” of UFOlogy.

  2. dandare said

    Thanks Peter for your take on this…. and very interesting!
    Its something i have not given much thought too, but your insight, has me interested to look into this some more.
    Thank you 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: