UFO Online by dandare

UFO Updates, documents, archives, anything ufo related

UFO Update (34)

Posted by dandare on March 22, 2008

Welcome to UFO Update (34)………..

and a happy Easter to you all….


Inexplicata.blogspot.com (the journal of Hispanic Ufology) has “Roundup: the 2008 UFO wave of Argentina” (march 12th,2008). 

In “A UFO cold case” (posted 18th march,2008….latimes.com) investigators are searching for Raji, who allegedly photographed a UFO drone, and then disappeared on the internet… I do not know why this is being discussed or investigated, as it is a well known fact that these photos are fakes. 


 A similar article can be seen at upi.com “detectives seek ufo answers” (posted 18th march,2008).

From airshippilot.blogspot.com “UFO…no just a blimp” (posted 20th march,2008).

in blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com “Discussion on UFOs” (posted 16th march,2008) is a thought provoking post. I agree with this statement especially “In general, if someone is bent on pursuing such a frustrating subject they fall into one of three categories.

They may be digging for proof of alien life, they may be trying to uncover dark world governmental activities relating to unidentified objects, or their drive may be a combination of both, the search for proof of alien visitation and contact and the government’s hidden knowledge of that fact along with its pursuits of harnessing alien technology” (extract from article).I would, as has been mentioned before on this blog, have to fall into the ‘both’ category. The comments at the end of this article…. worth a glance. A later article by the site is also worth a look “UFOs and what to do” (posted 19th march,2008).


azcentral.com has “UFO buff explores Chandler crop circles” (posted 19th march,2008); 

It says “Polani said he regrets not being able to photograph the Chandler phenomenon from the air; the crop was harvested hours after he spotted it.
He was able to walk into the field and capture patterns of downed stalks pointing in different directions among clusters of stiff, erect plants. And he picked up a few of the damaged stalks which appeared to be burned and bent in different places
” (extract from article). For those interested, there is a good article here (by Andy Thomas on the UK 2007 crop circles).

wapakdailynews.com has “Spreading secrets” (posted 12th march,2008)… i’m afraid this was one post i missed in last weeks update.

thestar.com has an article, covering the recent Alien abduction festival “An ET invasion for a cause” (posted 21st march,2008).


In theindependent.com (santa Barbara) “Plasmatron oscillators and psionic helmets – available now!” (posted 15th march,2008). I think i’ll turn down the offer however…..

MyFox has “UFO captured on tape in Pasco” (posted 14th march,2008); it comes with a video……

The telegraph.co.uk has “Prof Michio Kaku on the science behind UFOs and time travel” (posted 20th march,2008).

But what is frustrating to scientists is that, of the thousands of recorded sightings, none has produced hard physical evidence that can lead to reproducible results in the laboratory. No alien DNA, alien computer chip or physical evidence of a landing has ever been retrieved” (extract from article)… however, it does go into some interesting theories, and possible outcomes.

Lastly, on a very serious note….. and i think an excellently made point about Tibet today comes from “Living nightmare of an alien takeover” (posted 20th march,2008)…….

It starts “You wake up to discover Britain has been taken over by aliens. The government and the royal family have fled into exile. National and local government, the army, the police, schools and universities, major banks and businesses and hospitals are now all run by aliens. They don’t speak English ” (extract from article)….it carries on with everything being destroyed…..by aliens and you can do nothing…. 

at the end it says”Then you wake up and realise it’s a nightmare. But it isn’t if you’re Tibetan. If you live in Tibet or the western provinces of China, this is what is happening. That is why Tibetan men, women and children are protesting – and dying. For them the nightmare is real” (extract from article). Sorry, this is not about UFOs, but the alien effect was a clever slant on things… on an important issue.

Also of interest:

amandala.com  (Belize) “Strange night sightings in Pan” (posted 18th march,2008)

timesonline “science fiction author arthur c. Clarke dies aged 90” (posted 18th march,2008)

restarfilms.blogspot.com “UFOs: to weird to be extraterrestrials” (posted 21st march,2008)


  UPDATE: 26th march 2008

Further to the comments below, on the california drone sightings? i am in the middle of writing up a rather long post on the drone sightings…. this is taking longer than i thought… i hope to have it on here in the very near future (2 to 3 days)…. hence, i’m afraid (as this is taking up any spare time i have) i have been unable to add any new posts.

 I have not gone away/given up,ect…… thanks for your patience.




17 Responses to “UFO Update (34)”

  1. Karen said

    I’m one of the team that has hired the PI’s. You presume too much I’m afraid. We have studied this matter since May 2007 and there are 5 of us in the team. We are well educated, mature and sensible people. The work we have done on this matter requires almost as much time as a full time second job every day including weekends. There is a great deal more to this case besides just finding a pole and Raj’s house. Anyone who takes a armchair view of the videos made by people we know and the comments out on the internet could easily assume that this has been debunked, but it is not the case. There has never been any conclusive evidence provided that shows that any of the original photographs are fake. As I said, it is a very important interesting case. We have more information than we can publish at this time and so far the evidence we have shows that the witnesses and their reports is more viable than any other conclusion we can find so far and we have done a great deal of work on this matter. The final conclusions when our investigation work has concluded will be a big surprise to you I’m sure.

  2. dandare said

    Hi Karen…. i thank you for your response, however until i see further evidence to the contary (and some proper proof), i’m afraid i will stick to the belief that this is a hoax (of CGI origin). I do not presume too much, because there is nothing to say this is the real deal….
    I might be adding an article on this very subject soon….
    Have a look at http://www.hyper.net/ufo/vs/m05-001.html in reference to the CADET/isaac drone of 2007, which is connected …… this is just one link of more i am accumilating.
    I would also go further and ask 2 quick questions…. why are these coming out now (it was around in 2007 and dieing a quiet death)… why are the media picking up on this? especially fox news…
    Until proven otherwise, i believe it to actually discredit the ufo movement?
    Why do i have a negative response to this…. i can only go on the information given to me at this moment in time, and it just does not add up. The photo also seems layered?
    If i am wrong then i will apologise on this very website, but until then i’m afraid, i put it down to a hoax.

  3. Tom Reidar said

    You are probarly paid by the goverment to tell that there is no connection betveen The Caret program and the picture of this drone.
    Debunkers like you and Robert Sheaffer make me shake my head in disbelive.
    You will get a suprise long before 2012.
    Hopefully readers of this site will remember your name.

  4. dandare said

    Ok…. which planet are you from Tom!! oh, so now i’m being paid by the government…. i wish. And as for the significance of 2012, well i will not comment on that.
    I have decided that next week (although not paid by the government, as i have to go to work like anyone else)sometime, i will be putting an article up on this subject (i cannot be sure when though).
    If you had read some of my website, i believe in one of two things…. that UFOs are extraterrestrial or they are part of a government black ops project.(or probably both).
    So with this in mind, would you not think that this agenda would suit my needs… i could have easily said yes i believe in the drones, and not questioned it(blinded by my own agenda). But i’m afraid that is not me…..
    I still say, “i could be wrong, and i’ll be the first to say so if this is true”.
    Also i have connected the cadet drone to the raji picture..
    I can understand where you are coming from, and i would like this solved one way or another….. all i want is the truth!

  5. Nick said

    Karen, im faily sure this is hoaxed. Around the time they were doing the viral advertising campaign for halo 3, a website with a picture of this drone was used. We found out it wasnt linked to halo 3 at all, but it was in fact linked to a viral advertising game site. The site with the picture of the drone was called 23.com. it has since then changed to a picture of a restaurant. I cant remember the site for the viral gaming. All i remember was that they were forums and they required an invitation to join them. You had to play a “dot puzzle” game that consisted of random sentences and dots to get an invite, it was extremely confusing i spent alot of time trying to solve it but i never did.

  6. Steve said

    Dear Dan, dear Nick,

    Thank you so much for taking this story with a big grain of salt, as I do not see any reason to dig much deeper into it.
    You’re correct that this is a major attempt to discredit the UFO phenomenon. It is IMO an orchestrated move to make believe first (on a very large scale – thank you very much you silly UFO Hunters for swallowing that big piece of junk) with the clear intend to debunk it later.
    More international newspapers will cover this yet to debunked story very soon. The net result is already very predictable. Too bad…
    BTW, Karen, why don’t you throw your crystal clear cards on the table???
    And Tom, I have great disbelieve in your disbelieve!!!
    In case Robbie Williams reads this as well… Please stop peeking through that expensive telescope. I have better (and more expensive) ideas for you to help us all out. Just try me!

    Best regards (as usual),

  7. Nick said

    All i know is that this drone was used on that 23.com site and it only showed a portion of the drone showing the strange wording on it. after this other pictures and videos began surfacing and we all considered it a hoax since it was part of a viral advertisement/game. I thought this ended there but people are still seeing these drone pics and being misinformed. This takes away attention from the real footage and pics out there and makes ufos look dumb like they always have. I encourage you all to watch the “greatest story ever denied” ( http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5980990221766439646 ) and “out of the blue” ( http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5545276251937701731 ) if you havent already. Its great that interest is flaring back up for ufos but i dont think these drones deserve the credit they are getting.

  8. dandare said

    Sorry, i have not replied for ages…..lol. I have been looking all over the internet. Thanks to both nick and Steve 🙂
    I apologise as its very late, and i need to get some shut eye. However, i found a link to 27.com at http://www.nowpublic.com/27_coms_hidden_image with i think what you are referring to nick (thanks for that,much appeciated)? i hope. Also have about 20 odd forum posts that i have looked at…. eeeek. Still believe this to be a fake….
    I shall try and put up a post on this next week…..maybe with a whole load of links, plus background info to last year.
    Is it me or does this seem like a “Bob Lazaar effect”?

  9. dandare said

    oops also this link http://www.perplexorum.com/showthread.php?t=1725 which is more interesting. Also page 2 of this post seems to be getting to the crux of the matter…obviously the website is not the same anymore.
    If you look at the site now at http://27.com/ro.jpg it has what seems like a man in black, (hat and all, face covered in black) holding an acid smiley face (with blood on it); the watchmen movie?
    I sound sad, but fake or not, i want to get to the bottom of this.

  10. Nick said

    ahh yes it was 27.com lol. well yah thats the site i meant, and its part of an online viral campaign nothing actually real. People work together using forums and IM to solve these online puzzles. Its all just part of a game.

  11. It’s actually very easy to say that these things are not true, so as to avoid future complications, but I credit those who gave efforts to find the answers.

    Maybe it’s real, maybe it’s fake, but whatever it is only their God (or the most advanced technology there is) knows.


  12. dandare said

    Hi Everydayman and thanks for your comments… could you please give me more information on why you believe ARG is not a possible theory/reason for the drone photos and sightings being put up onto the websites/internet? i would welcome your input.

  13. Eric said

    What about the markings on the large “wing”. It seems to have 3 letters, I think the first two are “RA “, but I’m not sure. Can’t that image be blown up and read? That is the first thing I would do if i was investigating this and had good imaging programs. You can’t see the markings on the picture on this site because its too small, but if you look at the AOL picture, there are clearly markings.

  14. dandare said

    Thanks eric for your observations….i hope to look into this (although i do not have great photo programs). I will be posting part 2 of the california drones within the next week or so…. and will try to cover/discuss problems,ect with the photos.

  15. sandrar said

    Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post… nice! I love your blog. 🙂 Cheers! Sandra. R.

  16. You are probarly paid by the goverment to tell that there is no connection betveen The Caret program and the picture of this drone.
    Debunkers like you and Robert Sheaffer make me shake my head in disbelive.
    You will get a suprise long before 2012.
    Hopefully readers of this site will remember your name.

    • dandare said

      I wish i was paid by the government to do so……however, i think the opposite is true of the “droners” who are giving ufology a bad name, and tried (but ultimately failed) to make this seem real. Also who profited from all of this? i’ll let you decide.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: